Erasmus+ Sport 2026: Reading the Evaluation Patterns from 6,800 Funded Projects
Editorial image: abstract data visualisation
Placeholder body pending editorial
This is a placeholder draft. The final article will leverage the 6,833 accepted Erasmus+ Sport project cards held in the Amsterdam reference database to map partnership geography, thematic weighting and consortium scale against evaluation outcomes.
What the dataset shows
Across the full set of funded projects, three structural signals appear consistently in successful proposals: balanced consortium geography, tight alignment to a single thematic priority, and a coordinator with prior Erasmus+ delivery history.
Why this matters now
The 2026 call cycle opens with a revised evaluation grid that shifts more weight onto impact and sustainability. Organisations preparing submissions should study funded-project patterns rather than relying on the written guide alone.
Placeholder note: the full article body, with real analysis across all five pillars of the evaluation framework, will be written by the editorial team ahead of launch.
Get briefings like this every Thursday.
Subscribe
